91˿Ƶ

News

Only some kinds of job losses cause voters to elect strong leaders, study finds

Research indicates U.S. voters are more likely to favour authoritarian leaders when companies move jobs overseas than when jobs are threatened by automation
People sitting on chairs in a row waiting for a job interview. Des personnes assises sur des chaises en attendant une entrevue.
Published: 23 April 2026

Americans are more likely to turn to authoritarian leaders when jobs are being lost due to offshoring than they are when job losses result from automation, an international research team has found. This is despite the fact that automation tends to lead to greater job losses.

“We wanted to understand why some economic shocks create anger at politicians and demands for tougher or more radical leadership, while others don’t,” said Leonardo Baccini, a professor in 91˿Ƶ’s Department of Political Science and the lead author of the paper published in Research and Politics.

The study was based on a survey of 3,500 respondents in the United States.

The researchers found that people expected some form of political intervention when job losses were caused by either offshoring or automation. Job losses caused by bankruptcy did not trigger the same demand for a political response.

Which type of leader is most likely to prevent layoffs?

Participants who took part in the study were presented with short scenarios describing layoffs of 1,000 people caused either by automation, offshoring or bankruptcy (the latter acted as a control group).

They were then asked whether political leaders should intervene to prevent the layoffs, and if so, which leadership qualities were likely to prove most effective in doing so.

Participants were asked to choose between traits that the researchers associated with either populist or authoritarian leaders.

Traits such as being “political outsiders” who “listen to the people” were associated with populist leaders. In contrast, traits such as being willing to “use force,” being “unconstrained by the rules” and being willing to implement divisive policies “even if it upsets other people in the country” were linked to authoritarian leaders.

The researchers found that only offshoring led to an increase in the demand for authoritarian-style leaders.

They said their next steps will be to explore whether Europeans or Canadians react similarly, examine the extent to which offshoring is perceived as a threat from foreign workers and further study how voters react to job losses as new AI technologies emerge.

“The source of economic shocks matters for their political outcomes,” by Leonardo Baccini, Costin Ciobanu and Krzysztof Pelc, was published in Research and Politics.

DOI:

Back to top